But will it satisfy the spoiled ones? | Babygirl (2024) movie | pre-screening musings

Romy: “How did you get that dog to calm down?”

Samuel: “I gave it a cookie.”

Romy: “Do you always have cookies on you?”

Samuel: “Why, do you want one?”

Let me preface this unusual blogpost (who else would put so much thought into a movie before they saw it?!) by saying that I am a very, very spoiled girl.

And that I have given the subject I am about to present to you more thought than the average married couple contemplating concepts like sexual growth and physical sovereignty, before they submitted to monogamy.

In fact, I gave up an amazing long-term relationship when I was in my early 30s, and with it close to every friend I had (and it is still the big disclaimer in friendships, palpable to almost no one);
All, in order to investigate my sexuality.

So I know what I am talking about.

And let me tell you that sexual liberation is not, as they say in Fight Club, a weekend retreat.

This isn’t a seminar
This isn’t a weekend retreat
Where you are now you can’t even imagine what the bottom will be like
Only after disaster can we be resurrected
It’s only after you’ve lost everything that you are free to do anything

Nothing is static
Everything is evolving
Everything is falling apart

This is your life (feat. Tyler Durden)
The Dust Brothers

And a few years ago I also saw Halina Reijn’s movie Instinct multiple times because I thought, for definitely more than a minute there, she was actually on to something.

For a moment I thought Reijn, who is Dutch just like me, had unearthed the hidden gem from the cold ashes of the apocalyptic erotic landscape left behind by Basic Instinct.

The 90s were the decade where the very foundations of our sexuality were taking a punching. We could take no more, and were bleeding on the floor of Lou’s basement coughing our guts out.

Maybe this too deserves a reference to Fight Club (1999), because it gave us a new sense of nihilism.

Everything is falling apart.

Sex education for the new millennium.

But in the midst of it all, Basic Instinct had given us something, or multiple things even, which were never properly explored anywhere else.
Not then, not since.

And when Halina Reijn directed the Dutch movie Instinct (2019) about a female psychiatrist who gets into a sexual affair with a convicted sex offender, for a moment there;
I thought she had found Basic Instinct’s hidden treasures.

Now after a few viewings I understood that it was not there. That it had been me wanting to see it, like wanting to like a man and being willing to let a few mistakes pass because you do not want to judge too harshly.
But it wasn’t there.

The movie Instinct (2019) did not explore the hidden Basic Instinct topics.
And January 2025, here we are again.

Will Reijn’s next movie, Babygirl, bring to the surface what are by now Basic Instinct’s three decades old secrets?

Now at first glance Basic Instinct and Babygirl may seem miles apart.
Covering entirely different themes.

In Basic Instinct, the female multimillionaire protagonist (most would say antagonist) is single writer Catherine Tramell.
She oozes power, both monetary as well as sexually. And she’s possibly a serial killer, which will also keep you on edge.

In Babygirl the female multimillionaire protagonist is a married CEO Romy Mathis and she has children.
She oozes power economically, but is nowhere near Catherine Tramell’s omnipotence.

And therefor (because of this difference in power) the men these women meet, are also different in power.

Omnipotent Catherine Tramell meets a tough-as-nails homicide detective Nick Curran.

Where professional powerhouse Romy Mathis meets a self-aware, confident Samuel, at the beginning of his career.
I tried to look for a last name, and he doesn’t even seem to have one.

Either way, I think with Romy also being less powerful than Catherine, the fact that Gen Z character Samuel isn’t the explosive vessel of suppressed emotions that Nick Curran was, is a good thing.
And from what I have seen, the character of Samuel really embodies why I am such a big, big fan of Gen Z!

Whenever I talk to them I feel the only job we, the older generations, have is to keep things afloat until they are in power.
Gen Z will know what to do!

But I digress.

So either way I think Romy, just like Catherine, found a one of a kind lover.
And that it was this match that created an Erotic Space.
A concept which I consider the gem, the gift, of Basic Instinct.

How the importance and the quality of this Erotic Space is being regarded within the movie Babygirl, will determine what my verdict of Babygirl will be.
So pay attention.

Watching Basic Instinct, it is tempting to conclude Catherine’s and Nick’s tension is being built from the subtext of what is being said. And the context it is said in.
When Catherine Tramell lights a cigarette saying: “What are you gonna do? Charge me with smoking?”
When she is being interrogated by five or so officers, that clearly shows she is in power.

But it is because they know she is worth over a hundred million dollars, that she actually gets to have that power.
They are very aware she could hire a hot shot lawyer and sue their department.

The same with Nick.
Years of undercover work in the drugs scene have earned him a reputation of being lawless.
He was addicted to cocaine and alcohol and has had five shooting incidents within a few years, including one where he shot innocent tourists.
Yet he has managed to get out without being punished.

“You see! We’re both innocent Nick.”
Catherine laughs, when discussing their clean lie detector tests.

Their meeting of minds has created an impenetrable bubble around the characters of Catherine Tramell and Basic Instinct’s male protagonist, detective Nick Curran.

Nick Curran is the only one who is at her level, and she has recognized him as her equal, just from reading newspapers alone.
“She knows where I live and breathe,” Nick says to his colleague Gus. “I’m not afraid of her.”
“Why the hell not?!” his partner exclaims.
“I don’t know, I’m just not.”
(all quotes done by heart – may be inaccurate)

And yet!
The Erotic Space shared by Basic Instinct’s Catherine Tramell and Nick Curran, is
->a space they both also have around them when they are alone<-

A place of pure potential, of awareness, of sovereignty.
And it is in that space, where the erotic tension is being sparked the moment they suddenly see someone else “in there”.

They are no longer alone.

You could say they finally find someone who is fluent in their love language;
Unadulterated, scared of no one, no holds barred, power.

Nick and Catherine meet each other, in a place where no one else is.

Imagine having climbed your way to the top of a snowy mountain, and being used to not having anyone to talk to.
And suddenly someone else is there.
That’s Catherine and Nick.
Even if you believe she is a serial killer (which I obviously don’t) she will certainly never kill Nick because she knows very well how rare their connection is.

Basic Instinct is a tale about the Erotic Space that comes into being when two people are attracted to each other
->who are of equal high power<-

A game of minds, between equals.

From what I remember about Reijn’s other movie Instinct, is that I ultimately concluded that the two protagonists were either not powerful, or one was not powerful.
So that we had not been looking at an Erotic Space, but at I don’t know…. Probably trauma or something.
I don’t remember the details.

Which is absolutely not to say Instinct was not a good movie. And it has been instrumental in shaping my thoughts on this topic.
It was just that it was not the Hoped For movie about Erotic Space, that I hope to this day someone will make.

SPOILER ALERT FOR BABYGIRL
(although I will keep it to a minimum)

I have already watched spoiler reviews for this movie, and I know it explores the concept of her (Romy’s) infidelity from the context of the sexuality within her marriage.
So not getting Whatever at home;
and finds it with Samuel No Last Name. The younger, dominant, lover.

I have seen it being suggested that Romy’s infidelity could have been prevented if Whatever (I still don’t know what that is, but I don’t expect it to be relevant) had been properly understood by her husband.

I don’t know if this is really the trajectory!
If that is what I will see in the movie.
But if it is indeed a “Not getting enough at home” – theme?
Then I already know that once again Basic Instinct’s diamond has been left unturned, underneath the ashes of the 20th century.

Because magnetic sexual attraction is not about what you do or do not have at home;
It is about finding someone who can meet you at your level.

My verdict of the movie Babygirl will depend on if Romy’s problem is being rounded off to a technicality of what happens in the bedroom.
Something her husband can learn, and then all will be well.

Or if Babygirl recognizes that Samuel, even at his young age and without the professional accolades;
Was already more powerful than Romy’s husband had ever been.

And that shit cannot be taught.

.
Suzanne L. Beenackers
20th century writer, diarist & yoga teacher

☕️ Buy me a coffee
🌎 Paypal

 🇳🇱Tikkie van de week

That was it! 

Thank you for reading my World Between Worlds blog!
Subscribe to the blog, to get them in your mailbox.
You can find the subscription button on this page, probably on the top right.

 

NEW founded in MAY 2024: SUBSTACK
other socials:

Instagram  Twitter Rock Star Writer Facebook Facebook Suzanne Beenackers Schrijver LinkedIn

 

my business since February 2023:

Catacombe
become the Rock Star you were born to be

+ My new Dutch company

de Club
yoga voor generatie X

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Male Muse | The Secret Diary episode 1 (free/ open)

📷19 March 2023

I’m back!
Exactly like a little over two weeks ago, when for a few short days I could celebrate the return of lightheartedness, silliness, but above all of overwhelming happiness, that had always been mine until in 2018 the ground fell away from underneath me and suddenly;
“It” wasn’t mine anymore.
I was gone.
And not in a Buddhist-dissolving-the-ego kind of way, but in an everything-that-made-me-human, kind of way.

The blueprint of who I was had switched to its negative, and positivity became the exception, instead of the core of who I was.

The very short version of the story (leaving out loss and recovery of physical health as well), is that last month I found out what medication I needed (Femme hormones!) and they changed my life around.

Until a week of debilitating and entirely avoidable stress kicked in, and I found myself back on the concrete of misery overnight.
Clawing my way back, and understanding that although the pills were a miracle cure, they did require a price to be paid, to be effective:
I would need to regulate my life.

Every time I would let the events that had caused the stress, to happen again, I would be choosing losing another two weeks of my life.
On top of the 6 years that were already down the drain.

I needed to clean up, clear out, and to stop letting the ugliness of the world in so carelessly. An ugliness that had not bothered me at all, in the previous years, because it had given me an opportunity to crack my mind over it.
To think of a solution.
To get involved.
Or the very least: To lose myself in a roast/ rant about it.

For six years, my baseline emotion had been rage.
Constructive rage, funny rage, rage where people could warm themselves by and feel acknowledged for the unnamed pain they had felt, and I put words to.
It was a world I had never lived in, and I honestly wondered how I had managed to miss it!

There had been something fascinating about waking up in such an ugly place. It was like it gave me permission to unleash the darkest most diabolical Self and presented an intellectual challenge to boot.
Its novelty made reality something I studied with undivided attention, but I loved poking where the loopholes were.

Every year, I understood its dynamics better.
And I learned to wield the knowledge like a sword.

You could even say I had weaponized my rage into a thing of beauty, but all the time I was aware it was far from beautiful.
That the negative can never be a positive, and that although I was happy with how much I could bring to the world (for the first time I felt of use!);
It wasn’t me.

Real me doesn’t live here.
Never has.

I lost real me in 2018, then had her return for a few days which was such a profoundly moving experience… Suddenly I was myself again! And this was also the moment I could see, how NOT myself I had been since 2018.
And the world regained its ethereal beauty, and I regained my lighthearted happiness.

And then the stress kicked in.
My reckless behavior caused what I will call “Happy Suzy” to leave, “Dark Suzy” immediately taking her place again, pushing all the things back in place, cancelling appointments, writing watertight letters and making practical plans.

With the storm under control, today, after 2 weeks of Dark Suzy, is the first day I can feel Happy Suzy again!
And although I see I need Dark Suzy, and can definitely not live without her pragmatic, no bs skills, I also know that Happy Suzy is required as well.

I do not want to lose another day to the ugliness that kills Happy Suzy, and summons armed-to-the-teeth Dark Suzy, taking over my life.
And today, I really do know how to do that;

With male muses, as a representation of what makes Happy Suzy, happy. The thing she will stay for.

Because muses or men in general, are mutually exclusive to Dark Suzy. Dark Suzy does not care for men, unless they are either powerful adversaries or equally powerful allies.
She doesn’t have sex with them, she just bonds with them, conspires with them or she fights them.
She’s a fighter not a lover.

A striking thing about the 6 years I was “her” was that my emotional life flatlined. I have fallen in love twice, and I had a lover as well (whom I had met before that time), but it was like I couldn’t really enjoy it, or them, anymore.
There was a vital part of deep caring and emotional commitment and involvement that just wasn’t there.

Falling in love, living for love, and being inspired by a man, would be my markers of having regained my pre-2018 life.

And then this morning a video on YouTube about muses (The Anatomy of a Muse 19:24) made me recognize that although I speak of lovers, not boyfriends or partners, there was actually an even better word.

That what I am on the lookout for, to give Happy Suzy a new life, are not just men, they are;

muses

The video made me reflect on the men in my life, past and present, that I still consider muses, and how my relationship to them seems so different to what they have with other women.

Or let me rephrase that, because that is not entirely correct, because the way they feel or relate to me, is not necessarily different to how they relate to other women. Any measurable indicator (time spent, commitment given) would even tell you I have been of less importance  to them, with which I am fine.
But the way I relate to them, seems so different to what I have seen other women asking of these men.
None of them have asked them to inspire them.

I know multiple female writers who work under alter-ego, just like me, but even among them I only know one who protects the erotic space she and her lover are having.
One, aware of the invisible pillars holding their house of love.

She makes sure their love stays under the cover of this erotic universe, and is not taken into the relentless brightness of reality.
She is the guardian of an affair that is not necessarily a secret, but that has achieved all the hallmarks of a secret because she protects it.
She is the watcher of the affair’s potency, and makes sure it doesn’t spill its artistic juices.

She, is protecting her muse.

And it’s not even the case that because you write about sex, you will have a muse-artist relationship with your lover.
There are female writers who write about sex, who do not have muses they nourish and protect, and who find purpose in being open and transparant.
But I also know women who do not see themselves as artists, but who instinctively resist their affairs settling down into normal relationships.
Indicating a deep understanding it would kill the very soul of what makes their bond so special.
The end, of the sacred erotic space between them.

So this very first post in my Secret Diary series (a paid-subscriber exclusive for Substack) is where I recognize the presence of these muses of a sign I am in my original, happy healthy mode.
And their absence or having a comradery relationship, or even an antagonistic one, is a sign I am not myself and am in Dark Suzy’s 2018 and up – mode.
Which is not a bad thing (as I said: I do not plan to live without Dark Suzy!) but the muses are the indicator Happy Suzy is here.
And that she is not being crushed or driven out, again.

Which is why I am choosing this Secret Diary series, to revolve around nourishing my feelings, for men I call my muses.
The feelings that had disappeared, not necessarily the men themselves.

The feelings were independent from men being in my life.
Independent from whether they were choosing me, or were taking a different path.
But this does not mean that I was unresponsive to their signals, nor did it mean I did all the work of keeping a bond alive.
They worked, but in different ways.

The muses in my life have always left the erotic space open.
They could return at any given time.

Not all muses though. Some did shut the door. It only takes a glimmer of indicating they don’t want you, but if such a man is a muse, then it is as loud as thunder.

I recognize I have dropped the word Erotic Space here, a few times. I think it’s originally from Esther Perel, the relationship therapist, let me check.

I cannot find her using the term Erotic Space, but I did find this quote:

“Eroticism thrives in the space between the self and the other.”

― Esther Perel, Mating in Captivity: Reconciling the Erotic and the Domestic

To me, my relationships with men I would now call muses, are a mutual cultivation of that eroticism.
It takes just one of us to break the code of eroticism, one of us bringing the world inside, a topic or a third person;
And the Erotic Space we have between us
is gone.
The spell is broken.

In my experience, containing that erotic space, the sacredness of it, to not insult it, to not tear it, to not burden it and destroy it, takes a wordless understanding and appreciation from both parties.
You cannot make it a rule that you are going to defend it.
It has to be felt, it has to be instinctive.
And this only happens if both parties, in this case both the muse and the artist, have an aspect, an archetype of who they are, that lives only within that space.

An erotic space, is not where you visit the other;
But where you visit the part of yourself that cannot live anywhere else.

Whether we have been lovers or not, all my muses were men with whom this erotic space existed.
A world between worlds.

And the men I still consider my muses are the ones who left the Erotic Space intact;
And the door open.

These erotic spaces are not there for our affairs to restart, although they could. But they are the space I can visit, to bring me back to who I was.

Erotic Space, is what the Muses left me.
And it is my one true home.

.
Suzanne L. Beenackers
Rock Star Writer

☕️ Buy me a coffee
🌎 Paypal

 🇳🇱Tikkie van de week 

“The Male Muse”
is the first paid-subscribers only post on my Substack account.

My paid Substack subscription will give you the lived Secret Diary experience of my search for a happy ending.
Totally punned.

 

NEW founded in MAY 2024: SUBSTACK
free memberships provided
other socials:

Instagram  Twitter Rock Star Writer Facebook Facebook Suzanne Beenackers Schrijver LinkedIn

 

That was it! 

Thank you for reading my World Between Worlds blog!
Subscribe to the blog, to get them in your mailbox.
You can find the subscription button on this page, probably on the top right.

my business since February 2023:

Catacombe
become the Rock Star you were born to be

+ My new Dutch company

de Club
yoga voor generatie X

 

 

Basic Instinct: The Erotic Space Between Catherine and Nick

By now I know more about the meaning of the movie Basic Instinct, than the people that created it.

Originally, just like most people, I thought there was some kind of hidden secret. A whodunit Easter egg or clue we all missed, that would explain the entire movie.
Now this blog post is not at all about if Catherine Tramell, the female protagonist (some would argue the antagonist) is the murderer or not, but maybe it does help to know that I have concluded that she is not.
Which allows me to watch this movie entirely as a love story between the writer and 103 million rich Catherine Tramell, and the San Francisco detective Nick Curran, who has a shady past where he went rogue doing undercover work.

She has been studying Nick to model the main character for a new book she is writing.
The book is called “Shooter”, after Nick’s nickname because he shot innocent bystanders on a drug bust.

Presumably when he was on coke.
This was the time Nick was pulled out of his undercover work, and had to face charges, making headline news.
This was also the time when he must have caught the attention of Catherine.

If we look at Basic Instinct as a love story between a writer who is falling in love with her main character, and a troubled detective who has even lost his wife to suicide in the wake of the charges but whose spirit is unbroken.
Then this story becomes even more compelling than if you focus on the brutal murders taking place.

19A43901

You see that the brutal murders serve as the backdrop, it is the stage where Catherine and Nick find each other.
And because they are the only two people who are not intimidated or scared by the murders taking place, they immediately recognize each other as kindred spirits.
They are both familiar with death, and have both been in a dance with danger their entire lives.
But there is something else;
They both live in their own space.

They live in the world between worlds.

Last week when I started this blog, I did it because I realized I was more fascinated with the (inner)  world where the art is created;
Than with the craft of the fine arts themselves.
It also explains my preference for immaterial art in the form of performance art of Marina Abramovic as well as the music and concerts from Bon Jovi.
A remarkable difference between Marina and Jon Bon Jovi is however, and I don’t know if you’ve noticed this, that Marina seems to carry her world between world, her space as an artist, with her all the time.
Just like Madonna, or Obama.
They’re always “On”.
Whereas Jon Bon Jovi does not do that, and is often very laidback and usually more concerned with his philanthropy projects than with being in his artistic space on a day to day basis.
For him the artistic space is related to actively performing on stage, to writing music, to singing;
But it’s not where he lives.

But Catherine Tramell from the movie Basic Instinct lives in her artistic space.
She creates her own life with the dynamics, and topics she’s interested in. She actively scouts interesting people, she can write about. Exactly like she did with Nick.
“How’s your book coming around?” Nick asks at some point.
“It’s practically writing itself,” she answers, referring to all the things that are happening in Nick’s life.
She only has to write it down.

And Nick too, lives in his own space. His is a space of danger and adventure.  Catherine deliberately creates her own space, the stage for her books; But Nick is more someone who is drawn to worlds that already exist, and then is a master player in them.

He is aware of the space, the world between worlds, which gives him an advantage.
Most people take life very seriously, and do not see that they are free to choose their own part. 
To choose who they want to be.
To switch or uplevel their character.
Nick does.

But Catherine?
She’s the one who first conducts the play, who orchestrates its elements, and then waits for her characters to start playing.
Most play without knowing it, think what they see in her is reality.

Unlike all of Catherine’s friends, unlike her former partners and unlike the retired rock n roll star named “Johnny” and his surname starts with a B (I’m not making this up!);
Nick plays deliberately.

Catherine and Nick immediately recognize each other;
They both live in the world between worlds.
In the world behind our own world.

And when everybody else is worrying about murders taking place, and subpoenas, and warrants, and drama and mayhem;
All they see is each other.

Those of us who visit the world between worlds, to create their art or create their lives, know you are almost always alone there.
Marina meets others there when we are part of her exhibition.
Jon meets us there when he is on stage, and we are in the audience.

But Nick and Catherine, were eye to eye, privately.
They really saw only each other. There was a whole layer of reality between them, that others could not enter.

The first time I consciously started toying with the idea of what I have now called the world between worlds, was when I heard Esther Perel’s talks on creating erotic space between long-term couples.
She defines it as a space of possibilities and adventure.

But what I have experienced is that some people carry this space in themselves. And they create their art, or their relationships, from there. You enter their play, just like you see their rock show, or visit their exhibition.
I believe this is a factor in being sexually attractive (or active) that I have not heard about before;
If you live or visit this other world, artistic space, erotic space. If you are a creator of worlds just like Catherine.
Or if you are an active player in that space, like Nick.
But dividing the roles this strict is not how it is;
They’re both players.
And they’re also both creators of this world, with their consciousness.

In the world between worlds there is no difference between the creator and the created.
Between the player and the played.
It is a place where everything is possible, but the price for being there is that you need to give up your idea of right and wrong, and of reality.

Like wanting to know who did it in Basic Instinct.

.
Suzanne L. Beenackers

You can subscribe to the Wold Between Worlds and receive new messages in your Inbox.
The button is on this page, probably somewhere on the right.

my personal Twitter account

Also by me:

Rock Star Writer
Blog dedicated to Bon Jovi, sex, and rock n roll.
And Rock Star Writer on Facebook
&
my rock star writer YouTube

Liefdeseend en vintage yoga (Nederlands/ Dutch)

beertje Puux op Facebook (Nederlands/ Dutch)